Current:Home > InvestSpecial counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case -Clarity Finance Guides
Special counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case
View
Date:2025-04-15 09:00:18
Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith filed a blistering motion in response to former President Donald Trump's request that the judge overseeing his federal 2020 election interference criminal case recuse herself.
"There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding," Smith wrote in a 20-page filing an hour before a deadline set by Chutkan to respond.
- Trump's 4 indictments in detail: A quick-look guide to charges, trial dates and key players for each case
He said that in seeking Chutkan's recusal, Trump "both takes out of context the Court's words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals."
Smith also argued that Trump "cherry-picks" from two of Chutkan's sentencing hearings for two Capitol riot defendants, and in both cases, "the Court was appropriately responding to—and ultimately rejecting— a common argument raised by scores of January 6 offenders: that they deserved leniency because their actions were inspired by, or were not as serious as, those of others who contributed to the riot but had not been held responsible—including former president Donald J. Trump, the defendant in this case."
Trump's lawyers asked in a filing Monday that Chutkan remove herself from the case because of previous statements she had made in two separate Capitol riot sentencing hearings.
"Judge Chutkan has, in connection with other cases, suggested that President Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned," Trump's lawyers wrote in their request. "Such statements, made before this case began and without due process, are inherently disqualifying."
They highlighted statements she made about the former president, including telling one Capitol riot defendant in October 2022 that the violent attempt to overthrow the government came from "blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day."
"The public meaning of this statement is inescapable — President Trump is free, but should not be," Trump's attorneys wrote.
But in his filing, Smith provided more extensive transcripts of the remarks Judge Chutkan had made in the two Capitol riot sentencing hearings to make the argument that the full transcripts show that she "did not state that [Trump] was legally or morally culpable for the events of January 6 or that he deserved punishment," but rather, that "the Court was engaged in its judicial responsibility to hear, acknowledge, and respond to [the Jan. 6 defendant's] sentencing allocution."
Addressing the emphasis placed by Trump's recusal motion on this phrase, "it's a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day," Smith wrote, "From this simple statement of uncontroverted fact, the defendant purports to draw the 'inescapable' message that the Court believes that defendant Trump should be imprisoned. But the only inescapable thing about the Court's comment is that it stated an uncontested and accurate fact in response to a mitigation argument that the Court had heard many times before."
Smith argued Trump has not proven Chutkan made biased claims because he "must show that they display a deep-seated animosity toward him."
"The defendant cannot meet this heavy burden," Smith wrote.
"Because the defendant cannot point to any statements expressing actual bias, all he can say—and he says it repeatedly—is that the Court's comments 'suggest' some sort of bias or prejudice toward the defendant," Smith added.
Ultimately, it is up to Chutkan to decide whether her past statements create the perception of bias. A new judge would be assigned to the case if she recuses. Trump's attorneys could petition an appeals court to require her to recuse, but such efforts are often not successful.
Trump will be able to respond to Smith's counter-argument, and his deadline to do so is next week.
Fin Gomez and Graham Kates contributed to this report.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- United States Department of Justice
- Jack Smith
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at caitlin.yilek@cbsinteractive.com. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (121)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Why Kit Harington Thinks His and Rose Leslie's Kids Will Be Very Uncomfortable Watching Game of Thrones
- New York City’s freewheeling era of outdoor dining has come to end
- Vote sets stage for new Amtrak Gulf Coast service. But can trains roll by Super Bowl?
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Officials begin to assess damage following glacial dam outburst flooding in Alaska’s capital city
- NCAA Division I board proposes revenue distribution units for women's basketball tournament
- US abortion numbers have risen slightly since Roe was overturned, study finds
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- 2024 Olympics: Tennis Couple's Emotional Gold Medal Win Days After Breaking Up Has Internet in Shambles
Ranking
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Serena Williams, a Paris restaurant and the danger of online reviews in 2024
- How Lahaina’s more than 150-year-old banyan tree is coming back to life after devastating fire
- Wall Street hammered amid plunging global markets | The Excerpt
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Josh Hall Mourns Death of Longtime Friend Gonzalo Galvez
- How do breakers train for the Olympics? Strength, mobility – and all about the core
- 4 hotel employees charged with being party to felony murder in connection with Black man’s death
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Stephen Curry talks getting scored on in new 'Mr. Throwback' show
The Imane Khelif controversy lays bare an outrage machine fueled by lies
Why Kit Harington Thinks His and Rose Leslie's Kids Will Be Very Uncomfortable Watching Game of Thrones
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
The Latest: Harris and Walz kick off their 2024 election campaign
New York City’s freewheeling era of outdoor dining has come to end
Judge keeps alive Vermont lawsuit that accuses police of force, discrimination against Black teen